Cannon Park

Location of Cannon Park in red

Figure 1: Location of Cannon Park in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Cannon Park across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Cannon Park in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 51% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 51st 57th 25th
72nd 94th 62nd
2001 51st 57th 25th
72nd 94th 62nd
2002 51st 57th 26th
72nd 95th 61st 44th
2003 52nd 57th 26th
68th 93rd 60th 37th
2004 51st 57th 26th
70th 94th 59th 56th
2005 51st 57th 26th
70th 94th 58th 24th
2006 51st 57th 25th
68th 95th 61st 15th
2007 50th 57th 25th
67th 94th 60th 61st
2008 49th 57th 25th 5th 70th 96th 65th 51st
2009 49th 57th 25th
76th 96th 62nd 69th
2010 50th 57th 25th
71st 95th 64th 83rd
2011 51st 57th 25th
72nd 95th 64th 85th
2012 49th 56th 25th
72nd 95th 69th 61st
2013 49th 56th 25th
72nd 95th 66th 70th
2014 48th 56th 25th
72nd 95th 67th 67th
2015 48th 56th 25th
71st 94th 65th 76th
2016 51st 56th 25th
70th 97th 62nd 51st
2017 52nd 56th 25th
73rd 94th 60th 89th
2018 51st 56th 25th
72nd 96th 57th
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Cannon Park since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $148,109 $210,003 $NA
2001 $144,335 $204,250 $NA
2002 $162,493 $225,162 $NA
2003 $165,725 $225,351 $NA
2004 $177,482 $234,695 $NA
2005 $179,406 $226,497 $NA
2006 $193,216 $239,561 $NA
2007 $181,388 $224,318 $NA
2008 $183,725 $227,260 $181,036
2009 $183,725 $227,260 $NA
2010 $171,797 $212,504 $NA
2011 $166,790 $206,035 $NA
2012 $140,212 $172,022 $NA
2013 $138,094 $167,704 $NA
2014 $138,676 $167,704 $NA
2015 $136,770 $163,622 $NA
2016 $137,344 $163,622 $NA
2017 $142,345 $161,321 $NA
2018 $143,400 $157,700 $NA

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 15 93% 0% 0% 7%
2003 17 82% 6% 6% 6%
2004 19 95% 0% 0% 5%
2005 26 92% 0% 0% 8%
2006 17 76% 18% 0% 6%
2007 21 76% 19% 0% 5%
2008 12 92% 0% 0% 8%
2009 14 57% 36% 7% 0%
2010 8 50% 25% 0% 25%
2011 11 64% 18% 9% 9%
2012 8 75% 12% 12% 0%
2013 12 75% 17% 8% 0%
2014 13 69% 15% 8% 8%
2015 18 50% 11% 28% 11%
2016 13 85% 0% 8% 8%
2017 26 50% 23% 8% 19%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”