Castle Manor

Location of Castle Manor in red

Figure 1: Location of Castle Manor in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Castle Manor across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Castle Manor in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 74% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 74th 71st 39th 51st 79th 92nd 87th
2001 73rd 71st 39th 52nd 78th 91st 87th
2002 73rd 70th 40th 51st 77th 91st 91st 51st
2003 74th 70th 40th 54th 77th 90th 89th 36th
2004 74th 70th 40th 51st 75th 89th 91st 54th
2005 74th 70th 40th 57th 73rd 87th 91st 32nd
2006 74th 70th 39th 58th 73rd 55th 91st 32nd
2007 75th 70th 39th 59th 72nd 57th 91st 26th
2008 75th 70th 39th 61st 72nd 59th 92nd 75th
2009 75th 70th 39th 59th 72nd 63rd 94th 69th
2010 74th 70th 39th 60th 68th 60th 94th 52nd
2011 74th 70th 39th 60th 69th 59th 90th 62nd
2012 74th 70th 39th 59th 68th 59th 91st 74th
2013 74th 70th 39th 59th 70th 60th 91st 45th
2014 74th 70th 39th 59th 68th 60th 91st 66th
2015 74th 70th 39th 58th 70th 59th 94th 60th
2016 75th 70th 39th 58th 67th
92nd 60th
2017 74th 70th 39th 58th 70th 62nd 91st 61st
2018 74th 70th 39th 58th 68th 72nd 94th
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Castle Manor since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $164,129 $217,066 $126,701
2001 $160,341 $213,245 $123,230
2002 $172,740 $228,438 $124,432
2003 $180,172 $223,307 $128,110
2004 $188,499 $235,823 $125,511
2005 $187,120 $235,953 $119,874
2006 $205,284 $247,026 $132,626
2007 $192,339 $231,308 $142,478
2008 $193,074 $230,824 $147,552
2009 $183,491 $210,079 $140,189
2010 $171,912 $196,405 $133,792
2011 $166,679 $190,426 $130,165
2012 $140,158 $160,503 $110,555
2013 $138,147 $157,958 $96,459
2014 $138,358 $157,958 $95,505
2015 $136,561 $155,786 $88,550
2016 $136,717 $155,786 $88,550
2017 $141,373 $157,639 $93,397
2018 $144,100 $165,700 $92,000

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 30 90% 0% 0% 10%
2003 26 92% 0% 4% 4%
2004 31 87% 3% 3% 6%
2005 38 84% 5% 3% 8%
2006 40 78% 8% 0% 15%
2007 29 79% 7% 0% 14%
2008 26 77% 0% 8% 15%
2009 21 76% 5% 5% 14%
2010 7 86% 14% 0% 0%
2011 10 80% 0% 10% 10%
2012 16 62% 6% 6% 25%
2013 12 75% 8% 0% 17%
2014 20 95% 5% 0% 0%
2015 23 78% 0% 9% 13%
2016 28 79% 7% 0% 14%
2017 31 77% 10% 0% 13%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”