Euclid Park

Location of Euclid Park in red

Figure 1: Location of Euclid Park in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Euclid Park across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Euclid Park in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 53% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 53rd 52nd 18th 27th 88th 84th 64th
2001 54th 52nd 18th 30th 87th 84th 63rd
2002 54th 52nd 19th 30th 86th 84th 64th 56th
2003 55th 51st 18th 30th 86th 84th 67th 66th
2004 55th 52nd 18th 31st 84th 86th 66th 54th
2005 55th 51st 18th 34th 85th 77th 65th 38th
2006 56th 52nd 18th 35th 83rd 77th 71st 48th
2007 55th 52nd 18th 39th 82nd 86th 72nd 27th
2008 55th 53rd 17th 42nd 83rd 86th 75th 74th
2009 55th 53rd 18th 39th 80th 72nd 77th 90th
2010 54th 53rd 17th 40th 81st 80th 80th 57th
2011 55th 53rd 17th 40th 82nd 79th 83rd 93rd
2012 54th 54th 18th 39th 80th 75th 86th 91st
2013 55th 54th 18th 39th 77th 70th 81st 91st
2014 55th 54th 18th 39th 81st 76th 81st 89th
2015 55th 54th 18th 38th 82nd 81st 86th 83rd
2016 55th 54th 18th 38th 81st 85th 85th 62nd
2017 55th 54th 17th 38th 82nd 80th 83rd 60th
2018 55th 54th 18th 38th 81st 84th 84th
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Euclid Park since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $177,090 $217,576 $111,409
2001 $172,239 $211,616 $108,357
2002 $188,216 $215,472 $110,002
2003 $194,346 $226,646 $118,570
2004 $205,491 $245,514 $126,905
2005 $209,639 $247,399 $128,396
2006 $223,200 $272,095 $135,861
2007 $210,338 $254,783 $135,080
2008 $210,605 $242,862 $136,858
2009 $192,490 $221,241 $125,872
2010 $189,391 $217,678 $114,071
2011 $183,848 $211,052 $110,041
2012 $154,206 $167,285 $92,900
2013 $147,893 $158,169 $84,064
2014 $152,555 $166,009 $74,264
2015 $154,898 $166,966 $72,564
2016 $155,472 $174,802 $73,243
2017 $158,866 $179,939 $75,085
2018 $161,150 $187,600 $73,300

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 18 94% 6% 0% 0%
2003 21 95% 0% 5% 0%
2004 20 100% 0% 0% 0%
2005 26 100% 0% 0% 0%
2006 21 81% 10% 5% 5%
2007 16 81% 0% 19% 0%
2008 15 80% 0% 7% 13%
2009 19 63% 11% 0% 26%
2010 5 60% 20% 20% 0%
2011 14 86% 14% 0% 0%
2012 12 75% 8% 0% 17%
2013 19 84% 5% 0% 11%
2014 15 80% 7% 0% 13%
2015 22 73% 5% 0% 23%
2016 19 84% 5% 0% 11%
2017 18 72% 11% 6% 11%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”