Halyard Park

Location of Halyard Park in red

Figure 1: Location of Halyard Park in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Halyard Park across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Halyard Park in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 14% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 14th 16th 20th
21st 14th 19th
2001 12th 16th 20th
64th 19th 27th
2002 12th 16th 21st 6th 70th 37th 29th 2nd
2003 13th 15th 20th 16th 69th 39th 21st 3rd
2004 13th 14th 19th 16th 73rd 40th 23rd 13th
2005 13th 14th 19th 17th 76th 36th 20th 76th
2006 13th 14th 17th 16th 81st 17th 29th 57th
2007 14th 14th 17th 33rd 75th 18th 35th 98th
2008 14th 14th 15th 39th 80th 21st 41st 92nd
2009 13th 15th 17th 36th 81st 23rd 43rd 33rd
2010 16th 15th 18th 39th 73rd 21st 37th 39th
2011 17th 15th 18th 39th 72nd 21st 39th 81st
2012 15th 16th 17th 38th 77th 22nd 40th 76th
2013 14th 16th 17th 38th 73rd 23rd 43rd 79th
2014 14th 16th 17th 38th 75th 33rd 42nd 96th
2015 14th 16th 17th 35th 76th 37th 46th 2nd
2016 14th 16th 17th 35th 77th 34th 43rd 39th
2017 17th 16th 18th 35th 73rd 38th 43rd 95th
2018 23rd 16th 17th 37th 89th 62nd 43rd
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Halyard Park since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $162,964 $38,156 $NA
2001 $158,499 $37,111 $NA
2002 $176,714 $42,662 $261,829
2003 $182,897 $49,063 $248,724
2004 $191,685 $54,293 $284,143
2005 $193,527 $97,292 $401,238
2006 $211,505 $149,484 $407,458
2007 $197,815 $140,439 $343,671
2008 $198,684 $152,403 $347,698
2009 $194,302 $128,794 $352,898
2010 $181,169 $102,860 $313,236
2011 $175,654 $91,255 $284,190
2012 $155,121 $82,351 $236,718
2013 $145,721 $66,637 $240,591
2014 $146,357 $66,637 $239,320
2015 $151,397 $65,720 $237,074
2016 $151,554 $65,720 $237,074
2017 $149,608 $66,288 $232,110
2018 $189,900 $96,700 $245,650

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2004 1 100% 0% 0% 0%
2005 7 14% 14% 71% 0%
2006 7 43% 0% 29% 29%
2007 7 57% 0% 0% 43%
2008 7 57% 0% 14% 29%
2009 2 50% 0% 0% 50%
2010 1 100% 0% 0% 0%
2011 3 33% 33% 0% 33%
2012 3 100% 0% 0% 0%
2013 4 75% 0% 0% 25%
2014 7 86% 0% 14% 0%
2016 3 100% 0% 0% 0%
2017 9 33% 0% 33% 33%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”