Holler Park

Location of Holler Park in red

Figure 1: Location of Holler Park in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Holler Park across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Holler Park in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 16% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 16th 30th 4th
86th 95th 99th
2001 15th 30th 4th
86th 95th 98th
2002 15th 30th 5th
84th 93rd 97th 26th
2003 15th 30th 4th
83rd 94th 97th 20th
2004 15th 29th 4th
84th 94th 97th 19th
2005 15th 29th 4th
82nd 92nd 98th 16th
2006 15th 29th 3rd
81st 42nd 96th 13th
2007 15th 29th 3rd
81st 42nd 96th 39th
2008 14th 29th 2nd
81st 43rd 97th 31st
2009 14th 29th 3rd
84th 49th 96th 73rd
2010 15th 29th 3rd
80th 43rd 97th 30th
2011 15th 29th 3rd
81st 44th 97th 29th
2012 14th 29th 4th
83rd 44th 97th 67th
2013 15th 29th 4th
83rd 50th 97th 68th
2014 15th 29th 4th
83rd 50th 99th 46th
2015 15th 29th 4th
82nd 51st 98th 48th
2016 15th 29th 4th
81st
99th 45th
2017 14th 29th 4th
77th 46th 98th 65th
2018 13th 29th 4th
77th 59th 100th
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Holler Park since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $171,338 $188,231 $NA
2001 $166,573 $184,703 $NA
2002 $182,221 $198,254 $NA
2003 $187,531 $202,863 $NA
2004 $205,358 $210,004 $NA
2005 $201,054 $205,533 $NA
2006 $215,611 $224,071 $NA
2007 $203,523 $209,814 $NA
2008 $205,463 $199,386 $NA
2009 $199,386 $193,425 $NA
2010 $186,401 $180,766 $NA
2011 $181,507 $175,264 $NA
2012 $158,673 $152,376 $NA
2013 $156,262 $149,959 $NA
2014 $156,368 $149,959 $NA
2015 $154,218 $147,897 $NA
2016 $154,636 $147,897 $NA
2017 $150,682 $144,852 $NA
2018 $155,200 $156,800 $NA

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 3 67% 0% 33% 0%
2003 3 100% 0% 0% 0%
2004 4 100% 0% 0% 0%
2005 8 100% 0% 0% 0%
2006 6 100% 0% 0% 0%
2007 7 100% 0% 0% 0%
2008 2 50% 0% 0% 50%
2009 5 100% 0% 0% 0%
2010 1 100% 0% 0% 0%
2011 1 0% 100% 0% 0%
2012 3 67% 0% 0% 33%
2013 4 75% 0% 0% 25%
2014 3 33% 0% 0% 67%
2015 4 100% 0% 0% 0%
2016 3 100% 0% 0% 0%
2017 7 100% 0% 0% 0%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”