Honey Creek Manor

Location of Honey Creek Manor in red

Figure 1: Location of Honey Creek Manor in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Honey Creek Manor across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Honey Creek Manor in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 63% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 63rd 78th 59th 6th 69th 94th 86th
2001 63rd 79th 59th 8th 68th 93rd 85th
2002 63rd 79th 60th 10th 68th 94th 84th 47th
2003 63rd 79th 60th 9th 66th 94th 84th 47th
2004 63rd 79th 60th 9th 63rd 92nd 84th 47th
2005 63rd 78th 60th 11th 65th 94th 82nd 13th
2006 63rd 79th 59th 10th 62nd 96th 85th 31st
2007 63rd 78th 60th 12th 60th 73rd 85th 22nd
2008 63rd 78th 60th 13th 61st 76th 86th 68th
2009 63rd 78th 60th 11th 62nd 79th 85th 80th
2010 63rd 78th 60th 12th 60th 70th 86th 64th
2011 64th 78th 60th 12th 60th 69th 87th 58th
2012 64th 78th 60th 11th 59th 62nd 86th 40th
2013 64th 78th 60th 11th 62nd 71st 85th 56th
2014 64th 78th 60th 11th 62nd 70th 86th 60th
2015 62nd 78th 60th 9th 61st 66th 87th 69th
2016 61st 78th 60th 11th 59th
85th 79th
2017 61st 78th 60th 11th 60th 68th 86th 56th
2018 61st 78th 60th 11th 60th 78th 83rd
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Honey Creek Manor since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $140,682 $174,978 $110,681
2001 $136,828 $170,256 $107,649
2002 $152,246 $173,577 $105,958
2003 $157,003 $177,173 $103,578
2004 $165,003 $186,906 $107,790
2005 $168,022 $193,527 $111,227
2006 $183,512 $214,553 $139,345
2007 $171,952 $201,135 $133,042
2008 $172,855 $201,781 $129,379
2009 $166,194 $172,213 $116,406
2010 $155,468 $161,045 $106,482
2011 $150,847 $156,477 $93,875
2012 $128,317 $132,838 $81,597
2013 $126,334 $130,731 $72,252
2014 $126,387 $130,890 $66,425
2015 $122,142 $129,090 $65,512
2016 $122,142 $129,299 $65,512
2017 $125,211 $134,264 $64,140
2018 $127,400 $143,300 $60,200

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 33 85% 0% 12% 3%
2003 35 89% 3% 3% 6%
2004 37 92% 3% 5% 0%
2005 40 82% 5% 10% 2%
2006 48 81% 4% 6% 8%
2007 31 84% 3% 0% 13%
2008 26 77% 0% 4% 19%
2009 30 80% 3% 10% 7%
2010 11 82% 0% 0% 18%
2011 11 36% 27% 9% 27%
2012 8 62% 12% 0% 25%
2013 18 72% 17% 0% 11%
2014 21 76% 0% 14% 10%
2015 31 74% 3% 3% 19%
2016 46 72% 9% 7% 13%
2017 32 62% 12% 9% 16%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”