Long View

Location of Long View in red

Figure 1: Location of Long View in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Long View across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Long View in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 61% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 61st 80th 59th
36th 49th 67th
2001 61st 80th 59th
36th 49th 65th
2002 61st 80th 59th
35th 49th 68th 43rd
2003 61st 80th 59th
34th 47th 62nd 77th
2004 61st 80th 59th
34th 57th 60th 74th
2005 61st 80th 59th
33rd 61st 60th 61st
2006 60th 80th 59th
33rd 69th 62nd 54th
2007 61st 80th 59th
31st 68th 63rd 71st
2008 61st 80th 59th
31st 71st 60th 41st
2009 61st 80th 59th
28th 52nd 56th 57th
2010 60th 80th 59th
29th 50th 56th 89th
2011 60th 80th 59th
30th 50th 51st 47th
2012 59th 80th 59th
31st 54th 46th 37th
2013 59th 80th 59th
31st 52nd 45th 33rd
2014 59th 81st 59th
32nd 52nd 44th 45th
2015 60th 81st 59th
30th 46th 40th 57th
2016 59th 81st 59th
31st 50th 41st 61st
2017 59th 81st 58th
32nd 48th 37th 38th
2018 59th 80th 58th
32nd 49th 36th
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Long View since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $96,846 $118,618 $NA
2001 $94,193 $115,440 $NA
2002 $106,656 $117,949 $NA
2003 $109,711 $127,565 $NA
2004 $119,471 $138,786 $NA
2005 $125,348 $156,452 $NA
2006 $143,575 $176,669 $NA
2007 $134,672 $165,836 $NA
2008 $135,514 $166,369 $NA
2009 $111,848 $128,327 $NA
2010 $104,527 $119,706 $NA
2011 $101,457 $116,006 $NA
2012 $86,764 $100,436 $NA
2013 $80,515 $93,228 $NA
2014 $79,720 $92,963 $NA
2015 $75,751 $91,842 $NA
2016 $79,199 $84,319 $NA
2017 $77,541 $82,758 $NA
2018 $81,200 $88,200 $NA

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 32 78% 3% 6% 12%
2003 44 89% 5% 5% 2%
2004 49 92% 4% 4% 0%
2005 66 82% 2% 9% 8%
2006 59 69% 5% 7% 19%
2007 45 71% 7% 7% 16%
2008 19 68% 16% 0% 16%
2009 23 35% 9% 43% 13%
2010 16 56% 12% 6% 25%
2011 9 56% 11% 11% 22%
2012 7 57% 0% 14% 29%
2013 10 30% 10% 10% 50%
2014 15 33% 13% 7% 47%
2015 26 42% 23% 19% 15%
2016 35 26% 14% 23% 37%
2017 20 30% 35% 20% 15%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”