Maitland Park

Location of Maitland Park in red

Figure 1: Location of Maitland Park in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Maitland Park across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Maitland Park in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 30% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 30th 44th 13th
81st 96th 86th
2001 30th 44th 13th
81st 96th 82nd
2002 30th 44th 14th
78th 96th 83rd 70th
2003 30th 44th 14th
79th 95th 86th 41st
2004 30th 44th 14th
81st 96th 85th 23rd
2005 30th 43rd 14th
78th 95th 86th 12th
2006 30th 43rd 13th
75th 49th 88th 16th
2007 29th 43rd 13th
75th 50th 88th 20th
2008 29th 43rd 13th
76th 52nd 89th 44th
2009 29th 43rd 13th
77th 57th 93rd 43rd
2010 29th 43rd 13th
72nd 54th 93rd 32nd
2011 30th 44th 13th
73rd 53rd 94th 31st
2012 30th 44th 13th
76th 50th 93rd 31st
2013 30th 44th 13th
78th 56th 89th 61st
2014 30th 44th 13th
78th 56th 90th 47th
2015 30th 43rd 13th
76th 56th 91st 81st
2016 30th 43rd 13th
76th
91st 49th
2017 30th 43rd 13th
72nd 51st 93rd 54th
2018 30th 43rd 13th
72nd 67th 91st
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Maitland Park since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $163,983 $184,954 $NA
2001 $159,491 $179,888 $NA
2002 $173,228 $193,235 $NA
2003 $178,945 $197,753 $NA
2004 $196,531 $188,898 $NA
2005 $192,719 $183,636 $NA
2006 $207,213 $197,322 $NA
2007 $194,087 $184,767 $NA
2008 $194,711 $185,361 $NA
2009 $189,393 $179,751 $NA
2010 $177,029 $168,002 $NA
2011 $171,752 $162,888 $NA
2012 $149,846 $141,557 $NA
2013 $147,469 $139,312 $NA
2014 $147,734 $139,312 $NA
2015 $145,755 $137,397 $NA
2016 $145,860 $137,397 $NA
2017 $142,959 $134,827 $NA
2018 $145,400 $146,100 $NA

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 15 93% 0% 0% 7%
2003 10 90% 0% 10% 0%
2004 9 100% 0% 0% 0%
2005 14 93% 0% 0% 7%
2006 10 100% 0% 0% 0%
2007 9 89% 0% 0% 11%
2008 7 71% 14% 14% 0%
2009 6 67% 0% 0% 33%
2010 1 100% 0% 0% 0%
2011 2 50% 0% 0% 50%
2012 2 100% 0% 0% 0%
2013 6 50% 0% 0% 50%
2014 5 80% 0% 0% 20%
2015 13 62% 23% 0% 15%
2016 8 75% 0% 25% 0%
2017 10 90% 0% 0% 10%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”