Mount Mary

Location of Mount Mary in red

Figure 1: Location of Mount Mary in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Mount Mary across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Mount Mary in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 45% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 45th 72nd 27th
84th 92nd 93rd
2001 44th 72nd 27th
84th 92nd 91st
2002 44th 72nd 28th
89th 71st 91st 58th
2003 44th 72nd 27th 4th 84th 60th 93rd 92nd
2004 44th 72nd 27th 4th 86th 67th 93rd 41st
2005 44th 71st 27th 4th 83rd 62nd 94th 43rd
2006 44th 71st 27th 4th 82nd 63rd 94th 35th
2007 43rd 71st 27th 5th 82nd 71st 93rd 32nd
2008 43rd 71st 26th 6th 83rd 72nd 94th 85th
2009 43rd 71st 27th 3rd 84th 80th 93rd 97th
2010 43rd 71st 27th 3rd 86th 84th 95th 81st
2011 43rd 72nd 27th 3rd 85th 84th 94th 95th
2012 42nd 72nd 27th 3rd 81st 73rd 94th 96th
2013 42nd 73rd 27th 3rd 83rd 82nd 95th 94th
2014 42nd 73rd 27th 3rd 82nd 81st 94th 88th
2015 42nd 73rd 27th 2nd 81st 78th 92nd 61st
2016 42nd 73rd 27th 3rd 83rd 88th 93rd 86th
2017 42nd 73rd 27th 3rd 83rd 82nd 93rd 86th
2018 42nd 73rd 27th 3rd 84th 87th 94th
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Mount Mary since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $166,604 $205,197 $NA
2001 $162,465 $199,151 $NA
2002 $191,283 $227,811 $NA
2003 $189,984 $226,373 $137,377
2004 $203,301 $233,633 $223,279
2005 $198,566 $229,421 $216,979
2006 $219,094 $253,682 $235,517
2007 $205,445 $237,308 $235,910
2008 $205,989 $238,071 $236,668
2009 $202,132 $227,669 $224,572
2010 $199,280 $224,003 $220,956
2011 $193,214 $217,184 $214,230
2012 $152,914 $172,022 $169,546
2013 $152,872 $169,081 $166,857
2014 $153,667 $169,081 $166,857
2015 $151,554 $154,636 $164,562
2016 $157,666 $159,286 $164,562
2017 $161,628 $157,229 $169,198
2018 $165,800 $161,350 $170,300

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 30 93% 0% 3% 3%
2003 50 90% 2% 4% 4%
2004 29 90% 0% 7% 3%
2005 43 84% 5% 0% 12%
2006 40 95% 2% 0% 2%
2007 28 89% 4% 4% 4%
2008 29 83% 0% 7% 10%
2009 39 90% 8% 3% 0%
2010 11 73% 18% 0% 9%
2011 21 62% 10% 19% 10%
2012 24 71% 12% 4% 12%
2013 31 77% 10% 3% 10%
2014 28 79% 7% 11% 4%
2015 22 95% 0% 5% 0%
2016 42 76% 7% 5% 12%
2017 42 86% 0% 2% 12%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”