Nash Park

Location of Nash Park in red

Figure 1: Location of Nash Park in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Nash Park across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Nash Park in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 59% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 59th 81st 40th
47th 61st 81st
2001 59th 82nd 40th
46th 60th 80th
2002 59th 82nd 41st
48th 50th 81st 79th
2003 59th 82nd 40th
47th 50th 79th 95th
2004 59th 82nd 41st
48th 59th 83rd 93rd
2005 59th 82nd 41st
52nd 63rd 84th 55th
2006 59th 82nd 41st
52nd 71st 80th 54th
2007 59th 82nd 40th
50th 76th 86th 67th
2008 58th 82nd 41st
47th 71st 80th 87th
2009 58th 82nd 41st
51st 77th 76th 72nd
2010 59th 82nd 41st
49th 71st 75th 94th
2011 59th 82nd 41st
50th 71st 70th 72nd
2012 58th 82nd 40th
49th 63rd 64th 71st
2013 58th 82nd 40th
45th 55th 66th 81st
2014 58th 82nd 40th
46th 55th 63rd 75th
2015 58th 82nd 40th
47th 59th 64th 75th
2016 58th 82nd 41st
46th 60th 62nd 82nd
2017 58th 82nd 40th
46th 59th 62nd 79th
2018 58th 82nd 40th
45th 53rd 61st
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Nash Park since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $113,740 $151,167 $NA
2001 $110,907 $145,751 $NA
2002 $129,241 $166,745 $NA
2003 $133,289 $172,608 $NA
2004 $145,091 $187,172 $NA
2005 $154,274 $183,885 $NA
2006 $170,199 $202,921 $NA
2007 $159,370 $190,126 $NA
2008 $155,558 $193,659 $NA
2009 $150,065 $176,712 $NA
2010 $140,519 $173,867 $NA
2011 $136,130 $168,574 $NA
2012 $110,501 $136,929 $NA
2013 $98,631 $121,408 $NA
2014 $98,737 $126,175 $NA
2015 $100,305 $124,441 $NA
2016 $100,514 $124,441 $NA
2017 $102,092 $132,167 $NA
2018 $103,500 $129,900 $NA

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 46 96% 2% 2% 0%
2003 63 92% 0% 3% 5%
2004 63 92% 2% 2% 5%
2005 60 85% 8% 3% 3%
2006 55 87% 5% 4% 4%
2007 46 80% 2% 2% 15%
2008 36 81% 11% 8% 0%
2009 26 81% 0% 4% 15%
2010 20 80% 5% 0% 15%
2011 13 69% 8% 8% 15%
2012 17 47% 12% 18% 24%
2013 25 40% 8% 8% 44%
2014 27 44% 11% 15% 30%
2015 34 71% 9% 12% 9%
2016 45 58% 11% 13% 18%
2017 47 68% 9% 4% 19%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”