Rolling Green

Location of Rolling Green in red

Figure 1: Location of Rolling Green in red

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Rolling Green across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Rolling Green in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 49% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 49th 51st 52nd 14th 85th 76th 56th
2001 49th 51st 52nd 15th 86th 73rd 55th
2002 49th 51st 53rd 17th 82nd 78th 56th 35th
2003 50th 51st 53rd 18th 81st 81st 53rd 81st
2004 49th 51st 53rd 17th 81st 80th 53rd 86th
2005 49th 50th 53rd 21st 81st 69th 51st 47th
2006 49th 50th 52nd 18th 80th 70th 54th 20th
2007 49th 50th 52nd 18th 80th 76th 55th 65th
2008 49th 50th 52nd 21st 80th 76th 55th 64th
2009 49th 50th 52nd 19th 75th 66th 56th 77th
2010 49th 50th 52nd 20th 78th 70th 57th 54th
2011 49th 50th 52nd 20th 78th 70th 57th 86th
2012 48th 50th 52nd 19th 75th 64th 61st 54th
2013 48th 50th 52nd 19th 74th 66th 62nd 87th
2014 49th 50th 52nd 19th 76th 71st 63rd 79th
2015 49th 51st 52nd 18th 77th 75th 62nd 67th
2016 49th 51st 52nd 18th 77th
65th 64th
2017 49th 50th 52nd 18th 78th 75th 69th 71st
2018 49th 50th 52nd 18th 76th 82nd 66th
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Rolling Green since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $165,221 $252,674 $93,205
2001 $160,766 $245,752 $90,652
2002 $175,319 $245,238 $84,209
2003 $181,194 $259,354 $87,360
2004 $190,756 $281,554 $88,409
2005 $195,331 $281,177 $87,464
2006 $209,141 $296,605 $104,944
2007 $196,475 $275,811 $100,247
2008 $196,990 $264,133 $100,569
2009 $179,576 $241,694 $92,447
2010 $176,914 $236,767 $84,634
2011 $171,863 $229,448 $82,057
2012 $144,518 $181,872 $68,895
2013 $138,147 $171,147 $62,399
2014 $141,960 $179,622 $62,399
2015 $144,397 $180,653 $58,459
2016 $144,763 $189,221 $58,668
2017 $148,483 $190,783 $57,439
2018 $149,950 $200,500 $64,500

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 14 79% 7% 7% 7%
2003 29 93% 0% 0% 7%
2004 33 94% 0% 3% 3%
2005 33 79% 12% 0% 9%
2006 20 75% 0% 15% 10%
2007 24 92% 4% 0% 4%
2008 13 85% 0% 0% 15%
2009 15 53% 13% 27% 7%
2010 3 67% 0% 0% 33%
2011 10 60% 10% 0% 30%
2012 6 67% 17% 0% 17%
2013 16 62% 6% 6% 25%
2014 14 50% 14% 0% 36%
2015 16 75% 6% 6% 12%
2016 21 76% 5% 10% 10%
2017 22 82% 0% 0% 18%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”