SSCHC

Location of Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers (SSCHC) in red

Figure 1: Location of Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers (SSCHC) in red

The boundaries of this neighborhood are those defined by the Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers (SSCHC). They include portions of other neighborhoods in this report, such as Lincoln Village, Forest Home Hills, Polonia, and a small corner of Southgate.

Comparison to other neighborhoods

Most of this page compares trends within Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers (SSCHC) across time, but this table compares it to the rest of Milwaukee’s neighborhoods. It shows the percentile rank of Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers (SSCHC) in various categories for each year during 2000 to 2018. For example, in 2000 98% of neighborhoods contained fewer total residential units.
Table 1: Annual neighborhood percentile ranks, where 100 = the largest or highest amount and 1 = smallest or lowest
Percentile Rank
year Total Units1 Total single-family homes2 Total duplexes3 Total condos4 Median property value5 Median Value/ft.6 % Owner-occupied7 Sales rate8*
2000 98th 94th 99th 8th 31st 30th 35th
2001 98th 94th 99th 10th 31st 29th 35th
2002 98th 94th 99th 11th 30th 30th 35th 7th
2003 98th 94th 99th 11th 29th 29th 34th 9th
2004 98th 94th 99th 11th 30th 29th 35th 5th
2005 98th 94th 99th 12th 32nd 33rd 38th 4th
2006 98th 94th 99th 12th 32nd 34th 39th 6th
2007 98th 94th 99th 14th 31st 29th 40th 5th
2008 98th 94th 99th 16th 31st 28th 39th 8th
2009 98th 94th 99th 13th 32nd 26th 40th 8th
2010 98th 94th 99th 13th 29th 25th 41st 10th
2011 98th 94th 99th 13th 31st 25th 42nd 11th
2012 98th 94th 99th 12th 31st 25th 42nd 10th
2013 98th 94th 99th 12th 33rd 29th 42nd 10th
2014 98th 94th 99th 12th 35th 31st 43rd 8th
2015 98th 94th 99th 11th 35th 32nd 44th 6th
2016 98th 94th 99th 12th 35th 37th 44th 6th
2017 98th 94th 99th 12th 33rd 30th 44th 8th
2018 98th 94th 99th 12th 32nd 31st 44th
Note: Percentile ranks are only calculated for neighborhoods which include the characteristic being measured. For example, a neighborhood with no condos is marked missing, while the neighborhood in the 1st percentile contains at least 1 condo.
1 Includes all homes, condos, and apartments
2 Total standalone 1-unit homes
3 Total 2-unit homes
4 Total condos
5 Median entire property value as assessed by the City
6 Median of (Improvements value) / (Useable square feet of building)
7 Percent of single-family, duplexes, and condos whose location is also the owner’s mailing address
8 Single-family, duplex, and condo sales as a percent of total single-family, duplex, and condo properties
* No sales data available for 2000-2001

Residential property values, 2000 to 2018

Total property value

This “violin” graph displays the distribution of home values in Sixteenth Street Community Health Centers (SSCHC) since 2000. The shapes for each year are widest at the property value where the most homes are located. Larger “violins” indicate more homes, while smaller shapes indicate fewer. The thin line through the graph shows the median home value for each year.

The table below contains the median home value for each year from 2000 to 2018. Values are adjusted to 2018 dollars, and properties assessed at $0 are ommitted. This is because those properties are not literally worth nothing. The city assesses them at $0 because they are owned by an entity which does not pay property taxes; therefore they contribute nothing to the city’s tax base directly.
Table 2: Median inflation-adjusted home values
Median property value
year single-family duplex condo
2000 $84,613 $88,982 $49,952
2001 $82,295 $86,473 $48,584
2002 $93,759 $98,988 $53,119
2003 $96,764 $103,715 $58,740
2004 $102,281 $111,108 $57,214
2005 $116,017 $127,276 $53,623
2006 $130,884 $154,274 $65,940
2007 $123,256 $144,284 $71,647
2008 $127,158 $145,682 $71,877
2009 $115,763 $126,223 $71,877
2010 $104,182 $111,886 $70,720
2011 $101,234 $108,481 $68,567
2012 $82,997 $88,917 $66,204
2013 $81,786 $87,560 $65,153
2014 $81,786 $87,507 $65,153
2015 $79,930 $87,087 $64,258
2016 $80,035 $87,035 $64,258
2017 $79,587 $80,354 $62,912
2018 $82,500 $79,000 $61,500

Value per square foot

This graph is similar to the graph above, except it shows property value per square foot, rather than the total. These statistics are calculated by dividing the value of improvements made to the parcel (namely the building) by the total useable floor area of the structure in square feet.

Residential units

The next three graphs show trends in the number of housing units and their occupancy status. “Owner-occupied” means the property owner lists that location as their mailing address. Additional units at each parcel may be rented, so the “owner-occupied” number given here should be understood as an upper bound; the real number is almost certainly lower. Non-owner-occupied units may either be rented or vacant. These three graphs show total units, so (for example) every one duplex counts as 2 units.

Total, 2000 to 2018

Single family homes

Duplexes

Condos

Totals by type

Property sales and owner-occupancy

Single-family homes, duplexes, and condos
Table 5: The unit of analysis is the parcel. Some parcels contain multiple units.
year Total sold Remain owner-occupied Owner-occupied to other Remain other occupied Other to owner-occupied
2002 119 73% 8% 7% 12%
2003 124 76% 2% 10% 12%
2004 187 72% 5% 11% 12%
2005 266 53% 7% 20% 20%
2006 219 55% 14% 13% 18%
2007 123 63% 8% 3% 26%
2008 72 44% 19% 15% 21%
2009 51 51% 20% 20% 10%
2010 30 47% 3% 3% 47%
2011 19 53% 11% 11% 26%
2012 23 26% 9% 26% 39%
2013 37 41% 19% 16% 24%
2014 31 42% 3% 26% 29%
2015 25 28% 12% 16% 44%
2016 40 32% 2% 15% 50%
2017 55 40% 5% 33% 22%

This table compares the owner-occupancy status before and after each sale for properties coded as “Residential” or “Condominium” in the previous table. As explained above, “owner-occupancy” means the property owner lists that parcel as their mailing address. Additional units at an owner-occupied address may be vacant or rented. In this table “other occupied” simply means the property owner does not maintain their mailing address at that location. The property could be rented, or it could be vacant.

  • If a property was coded as owner-occupied in the year prior to the sale, and it is still coded that way in the first available property record after the sale date, it is classified as “Remain owner-occupied.”
  • A property coded “owner-occupied” before the sale, but not after is classified as “Owner-occupied to other”
  • A property not coded “owner-occupied” before a sale, and which maintains that status after the sale, is classified “Remain other occupied.”
  • Properties which aren’t “owner-occupied” prior to the sale but become so afterward are classified “Other to owner-occupied.”